Page 46 - ENGLISH_FullText
P. 46

the premises. The premises and the land it takes up cannot be used by
              anyone else, and therefore there is no cost to society. Providing a larger
              subsidy to the occupant-owners means they can then choose to sell
              those units on the open market and can therefore unlock the hidden value
              to be redeployed for a better use, a use that would not have been possible
              or permitted if the right to sell the units were infeasible. It is therefore not
              a double benefit. It is merely completing the other half of the benefit that
              was not initially provided.


                     As thing stands, the current PRH arrangement is a great subsidy
              in itself. The resource required to keep rents low among PRH tenants is
              considerable, and in actuality it is a long-term subsidy for generation after
              generation.

                     To illustrate this point, say a unit that is rented out for $20,000 per
              month in the open market is rented to a PRH tenant for $3,000 per month.
              The government monthly subsidy for the PRH tenants amounts to $17,000.
              In 20 years’ time the accumulated subsidy, without accounting for rent
              and market adjustments, will be in excess of $4 million. In other words,
              subsidising the unit for 20 years is equivalent to covering the full cost of the
              unit.


                     Table 13 shows that from 2008 to 2013, the average annual PRH
              turnover rate was at 0.92%. This implies that there is effectively very little
              turnover of PRH units, and by continuing to subsidise sitting tenants of PRH
              it means that there is no residential mobility. The present mechanism of
              a rental subsidy ad infinitum is wasteful and illogical, instead the same
              amount of resources could be used through the SHS to provide a strong
              incentive for occupants of public housing units to strive for bona fide
              homeownership.

              Table 13. PRH units’ turnover rate, 2008-09 to 2012-13








               Source:    Government press release.




























        46
   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51