Page 31 - ENGLISH_FullText
P. 31

5. Intergenerational



                                             Mobility and Poverty








                                             5.1 A Global Phenomenon


                                                    The rapidly rising number of divorces presented in the previous
                                             chapter is suggestive of some very real and alarming concerns about how
                                             poverty is being formed in Hong Kong and how it may affect social mobility
                                             and cause dynamic poverty across generations. Dynamic poverty differs
                                             from static poverty in that it concerns poverty across generations due to
                                             the lack of upward social mobility.

                                                    Low intergenerational mobility is evident across the globe. In
                                             Charles Murray’s book, Coming Apart: The State of White America, 1960-2010,
                                             he showed that between 1960 and 1980, the divorce rate of working-class
                                             Whites rose from about 5% to about 15%. The trend continued and by 2010
                                             had increased to 35%.


                                                    The well-educated saw a parallel rise between 1960 and 1980: their
                                             divorce rate rose from about 1% to about 7.5%, and was flat from 1980 to 2010.
                                             The difference between the two groups is reflected in the rates for children
                                             growing up in broken homes: a steady increase for the working class, a low
                                             plateau for the well-educated. Murray revealed that the percentage of well-
                                             educated people in happy marriages has sharply rebounded, while the
                                             percentage of working class in happy marriages has crashed.


                                                    While his findings are akin to the previous chapter of the Report,
                                             what is powerful about his thesis is the unusually high degree of family
                                             breakdowns associated with the origin and intergenerational transmission
                                             of poverty among unskilled low-income families. Their children suffer as a
                                             consequence and end up in poverty themselves.

                                                    By contrast college graduates do well not only economically but
                                             also in their family life. Their children have nurturing and secure childhoods,
                                             and lead productive, successful, and fulfilling lives when they grow up.
                                             Rising intergenerational inequality is produced when the poor have broken
                                             families and stay in bad neighbourhoods, while the rich have intact families
                                             and live in good neighbourhoods.


                                                    Striking a similar chord, political scientist from Harvard University
                                             Robert Putman reinforced Murray’s thesis with his book Our Kids: The
                                             American Dream in Crisis. He showed that in the United States, children

                                                                                                                  31
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36