Page 33 - ENGLISH_FullText
P. 33

of concentrated poverty with more children living with a single parent.
              These children reside in poor neighbourhoods where there are no good role
              models to learn from and to emulate. This demotivates them, perpetuates
              dynamic poverty and affects their future likelihood of moving up the social
              ladder.

                     Since the existing public housing programme implicitly encourages
              divorce, especially among the poor, it is leading to the formation of a new
              underclass inflicted with reduced future prospects.


              5.3 Income Inequality


                     Rising income inequality is linked with the problem of low social
              mobility among the less well-off families. It is made more difficult because
              many born into lower and lower middle-income families have made too
              little human capital investments because their parents are divorced.


                     Assortative mating further strengthens these effects as women
              have become better educated over time. Better-educated men are now
              more likely to marry better-educated women, and this is further worsening
              the human capital investment opportunities of the young generation in
              less well-educated families. They have fallen behind long before they could
              receive tertiary education. So despite subsequent efforts to catch up, they
              are still disadvantaged.


                     Their fate is in sharp contrast with the young generation from
              upper and upper-middle income classes whose parents are much less
              likely to be divorced and are able to make massive amounts of human
              capital investments from early childhood.

                     This problem can be remedied if more individuals become better
              educated. Investing in human capital would directly raise the incomes of
              more individuals by making them more productive. It would also indirectly
              increase the incomes of the less well educated in the population by
              reducing their relative supply. The rising income inequality is therefore
              a failure of society and government’s public housing policies which
              discourage human and social capital investment in poor, single parent
              households.

                     Hence, empirical evidence will be presented in the following
              sub-section to attain the benefits of bona fide homeownership and
              its concomitance with borrowing on home equity to invest in children
              education.


              5.4 Human and Soc i al Capital

              Investment


                     This Report believes that extending homeownership is essential to
              family investment in both human and social capital. Indeed, many studies
              have shown families who are homeowners are more likely to invest in
              childhood development and neighbourhood stability.

                                                                                                                  33
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38