Page 125 - Arts Innovation Report_2022_May11

就以上案例可看出，南韓及台灣政府都留意到版權、
文化IP 和創意的巨大潛力，較早起步的南韓已從他們
的版權產業中獲得經濟收益。隨着台灣計劃以區塊鏈
技術支撐，構建文化IP 貿易基礎建設，我們亦需要反
觀香港在這方面的進展。
香港在「文化 IP」交易上相形見拙
要建立一個卓有成效、具有遠見，且能夠促進創意作
品交易的知識產權制度，政府必然扮演着重要的
角色。
事實上，在國家政策頒布之前，知識產權署長期以來
都在推動香港成為區域知識產權貿易中心。早在
2015 年，知識產權貿易工作小組就這一願景發布了
策略框架，提出的四個策略之一便是「支援知識產權
的創造和利用」，正與創意產業的授權和特許經營等
業務相契合（商經局，2015）。
然而，在文創產業方面，我們目前仍無法如南韓及
台灣般，充分發揮文化 IP 的經濟潛力。
From the case studies discussed above, it is evident that both the South Preface
Korean and Taiwanese governments realise the immense potentials 前 言
related to copyright, cultural IP, and creativity. With an early start,
South Korea is sure to be reaping significant economic benefits from CH. 1
their copyright industries. As Taiwan plans for its blockchain-led 第一章
cultural IP trading infrastructure, we consider where we are on the
map for this. CH. 2
第二章
Hong Kong’s approach to “cultural IP” trading pales in
CH. 3
comparison
第三章
The Government plays an important role in building an effective and
future-proof IP regime that facilitates the trading of creative works.
CH. 4
In fact, prior to the national policy’s announcement, IPD has long 第四章
been promoting Hong Kong as an IP trading hub, and the Working
Group on Intellectual Property Trading had published a strategic CH. 5
第五章
framework to realise this vision back in 2015. One of the four
strategies proposed was to “support IP creation and exploitation”, in
which licensing and franchising arrangements in the creative
industries apply (CEDB, 2015).
However, as far as the CCI is concerned, we have not been able to
fully leverage the economic potentials of cultural IP the same way
South Korea and Taiwan have.
123