Page 63 - Arts Innovation Report_2022_May11

Preface
觀察 Observations: 前 言
• 文化界與創意產業之間的撥款有明顯差距 CH. 1
Obvious funding discrepancy between the “cultural” and the “creative” industries
第一章
• 缺乏撥款策略，撥款流於一次性 、較為零碎
No allocation strategy, fundings are one-off and piecemeal CH. 2
第二章

圖9 顯示了 2021 至2022 年香港給予文化藝術、創意 Figure 9 shows a snapshot of Hong Kong’s funding distribution CH. 3
第三章
產業、傳媒及知識產權的撥款分布。我們立即便能發 towards arts and culture, creative industries, media and IP in the year
2021–2022. One immediate observation is made: there is an obvious
現：「文化界」（圖9左側屬民政局轄下）和「創意產業」
funding discrepancy between funding for the “cultural industries” CH. 4
（圖9 右側屬商經局轄下）的資助額存在明顯差異。 第四章
(under HAB to the left of Figure 9), and funding for the “creative
industries” (under CEDB to the right of Figure 9).
如圖所示，2021 至 2022 年間，民政局在文化和藝術
CH. 5
23
方面的主要資助項目總計約 57 億港元。 相比之下， As the figure suggests, the major funding items for arts and culture 第五章
商經局（藍色）為廣播及創意產業，以及知識產權屬 between 2021–2022 for HAB add up to about HKD 5.7 billion. 23
24
（灰色）提供的資金相形見絀，合計僅達8.62億港元， Comparatively, funding from CEDB (in blue) for broadcasting, the
不及民政局所分配的六分之一。 creative industries, and IPD (in grey) pale in comparison, aggregating
24
up to HKD 862 million, which is less than one sixth of what HAB
從資助上的差別可以得出，政府缺乏具針對性或深思 distributes.
熟慮的分配策略，我們透過與南韓政策比較亦得出上
This funding discrepancy also signifies the lack of robust or
述論點，透過圖 10 能得出三個觀察。
deliberated allocation strategy at all. We need only a quick cross-
benchmarking with South Korea to validate this, and as per Figure 10
on the next page, we offer three observations.

23 該數字包括2021–2022年預算案的以下預算項目：民政局（總目53）的綱領（5）文化和（6）資助：香港演藝學院、香港藝術發展局和主要表演藝術團體。康文署（總目95）的綱領（3）文物及博物館、（4）表演
藝術和（5）公共圖書館。
This figure includes the following budget items from the 2021–2022 Budget Estimates: From HAB (Head 53) are Programmes (5) Culture, and (6) Subvention: Hong Kong Academy for Performing Arts, Hong Kong Arts
Development Council and Major Performing Arts Groups. From LCSD (Head 95) are Programme (3) Heritage and Museums, (4) Performing Arts, and (5) Public Libraries.
24 該數字包括同一預算案中的以下項目：商經局通訊及創意產業科（總目55）的綱領（1）廣播及創意產業。知識產權署（總目78）的綱領（1）法定職能和（2）保護知識產權。
This figure includes the following budget items from the same Budget Estimates: From CEDB’s Communications and Creative Industries Branch (Head 55) is Programme (1) Broadcasting and Creative Industries. From IPD
(Head 78) are Programmes (1) Statutory Functions, and (2) Protection of Intellectual Property, which is exhaustive.
61